Home
Representatives
Chaplaincy
Resources
Website Links
Subscribe to FrontLine
FrontLine Magazine
Articles






The Emerging Church: A Journey Back to the Future

Sam Harbin

Arriving just in time for the church service, you enter a dimly lit room. Projected images of ancient Christian art decorate the walls, accented by flickering candlelight. The aroma of freshly-baked bread makes your mouth water. Strains of contemporary instrumental music provide an auditory backdrop for the meditative activities of worshipers already unfolding at separate stations around the room. Some pray, face-down, on the floor. Others add entries to a “hunger journal,” describing ways they have experienced spiritual longing in their life. At another, worshipers compose Post-it note prayers and attach their petitions to the silhouette of a cross on the wall. At still another, little children express their worship through the medium of finger-paints. Motioning you into a seating area which resembles a Barnes and Noble coffee and conversation pit, a greeter presses a cool lump of modeling clay into your palm as the speaker for the evening takes his place on a high stool out among the audience. The speaker invites listeners to create, while he speaks, a clay sculpture based on the text for his talk, the sixth chapter of the gospel of John.

By this juncture, you may suspect that you have time-warped into an ancient Gothic liturgical gathering, perplexingly populated by contemporary Montessori preschool educators. In fact, you have found your way into a gathering of worshipers who belong to Generation X. Though among the “generation which defies description,” professing believers within these youthful descendants of the baby boomers, this first thoroughly postmodern generation, have taken to calling themselves the “Emerging Church.” What this group is emerging from is the old view of life in the world, known as the “modern” world view. What they are emerging toward is the apparent successor to the dying modern mindset, a new paradigm known as postmodernity. In the modern world, absolute truth was accepted, authority was authoritative, and the concepts of right and wrong were recognized and embraced, in principle if not in practice. In the postmodern world, truth is relative, authoritarian leadership is shunned, and the old boundary lines separating right and wrong have been replaced with personally determined value systems (“my truth”). In the modern world, science ruled and life’s perplexities were unraveled through research and reasoning. In a postmodern world, science is suspect, as is human reason, since the scientists themselves are biased due to personal prejudice and political agendas. Postmodern thinkers do embrace one absolute: that there are no absolutes. Since no truth can be absolute, all points of view must be equally tolerated; hence the cardinal sin in postmodernity is intolerance of the others’ values.

You may have heard much or little about the phenomenon known as the Emerging Church. Are these people truly saved and simply searching for creative approaches to evangelizing postmoderns? Is it a cult? Do you have to ride a skateboard or live in southern California in order to join? Should you be concerned if your twenty-year-old son thinks it’s cool?

Sadly, confusion and ignorance bolstered by strong opinion have been the response of Fundamentalists to these questions, at least according to our critics. The Emerging Church may become more the passing fad it now seems to be. Like the men of Issachar (1 Chron. 12:32), Bible-believing men and women desire to “understand the times” so they can proclaim the gospel faithfully and effectively. Informed awareness of the Emerging Church is at least part of an intelligent understanding of our times.

Like the generation which is their primary target for evangelism, the Emerging Church is difficult to define. Largely nondenominational, those who identify themselves as “emergent” fall across a wide spectrum of belief and practice. The more conservative elements appear to be brothers and sisters in Christ who grieve the failure of the modern church to reach and retain Gen-Xers, who are attempting to do something about it. At the other end of the spectrum, some appear to be questioning the very nature of the gospel of Jesus Christ. To their credit, when some emergent writers speak of a “broadened gospel,” they emphasize that salvation is not just a magical prayer that enables a person to escape Hell to live any ungodly way he chooses. Rather, genuine salvation is the beginning of a new life, a life of obedience to the commands of Jesus Christ. They emphasize growing to become more like Jesus, not just the prayer that marked the point when the process began. But, other emergent writers use the term “broadened gospel” to resurrect some old enemies of the cross—the reports of whose deaths may have been greatly exaggerated—such as the social gospel, which aims not at personal redemption from sin so much as the liberation of the oppressed from difficult earthly circumstances.

Because emergent groups fall across such a wide spectrum, it is wise to avoid broad statements such as, “The Emerging Church believes. . . .” It is more accurate to address what a single emergent congregation believes and practices. Emergent groups appear to be grappling with the same challenge faced by Fundamental churches: how to effectively confront a culture hungering for relevance with the exclusive claims of Jesus Christ. The Emerging Church has both assets and liabilities. On the positive side, emergent churches appear to be engaging contemporary culture with the claims of Christ. They are definitely “in the world” (John 17:11), not cloistered away in a Christian subculture, safe from contamination but sealed off from spiritual impact on pagan culture. Emergent pastors teach their people a “missional” mindset, reminding American Christians to think of themselves as aliens on a postmodern mission field, not citizens of a supposedly Christian nation.

The Emerging Church presents a new celebration of human creativity in worship. Worship gatherings are designed to engage humans as God made them, with all five senses. Not just sight and sound, but touch, smell, even taste will be summoned to enable the worshiper to understand spiritual truth and respond to God in expressions of praise. Various styles of learning, in addition to lecture, are accommodated through visuals and artistic activities, even during the sermon. Visual learners who quickly lose interest in emotion-free lessons find this new involvement refreshing. Men and women who can’t sing well enough to minister in music have found other gifts (formerly welcome only in Vacation Bible School) useful in the Emerging Church.

But there are problems, such as the uncritical acceptance of much of popular culture. In choices of entertainment, music, or the consumption of alcohol, emergent believers draw more inclusive boundaries than Bible-believers of previous generations. Where Fundamental churches have lacked creativity, the emergent groups seem to be on the pendulum swing of excess. Instead of helping people to objectively focus on God with all of their being, worshipers may be attracted to the subjective experience of focusing on God with all of their being. It is one thing to desire to “experience GOD” through genuine worship. It is something else entirely to desire to “EXPERIENCE God” in the name of worship.

To their credit, emergent groups have raised fair criticism of the megachurch movement. They react negatively to man-centered sermons that sound like a Tony Robbins lecture on human success. They reject performer-focused “worship events” which resemble rock concerts, complete with platform celebrities. Some emergent pastors have returned to expositions of Scripture in context to educate a Biblically illiterate younger generation. They lead gently as shepherds among sheep, not as paid professionals who drive the sheep by virtue of their position. Fundamentalists may be reawakened to grow and change themselves, through revitalization of these Biblical methods.

The Emerging Church does seem somewhat hypocritical in their often caustic criticism of “seeker-driven” churches. This new emphasis on designing worship around postmodern sensitivities may simply indicate that the “seekers” have changed, and now demand that the church adjust accordingly.

Fundamental churches can be thankful that the emergent groups are raising issues that can help our own self-examination, a process which should never stop until we see Christ in glory. Like Paul on Mars’ Hill (Acts 17), we must confront a culture of relativism. By God’s grace, let us be compassionately flexible where we can do so without compromise, but courageously firm to sound out in clear tones the gospel of the only Savior, Jesus Christ.

To learn more about the Emerging Church, you may find these books helpful: The Emerging Church and Emerging Worship by Dan Kimball (Zondervan Publishing) Mission to Oz by Mark Tabb (Moody Publishers) Postmodern Youth Ministry by Tony Jones (Zondervan Publishing) Dr. Sam Harbin is Chairman and Professor of Pastoral Theology at Calvary Baptist Theological Seminary, Landsdale, Pennsylvannia.
 
[ Back ]