CONCERNING RESOLUTIONS: The FBF's Right to Autonomy in its Resolutions: Recognizing that the FBF cannot address every issue of concern every year, it reaffirms its resolutions of previous years that are to be included in a forthcoming history of the FBF. Critics of the FBF should note that its position on previously addressed issues stands and the FBF cannot be distracted by an insistence that every issue of current interest in every circle be addressed in a reactive rather than proactive stance. The FBF regrets unnecessary loss of fellowship from its detractors, but refuses to be drawn into a redundant defense of its Fundamentalist identity demanded by embittered critics. Certain issues will be restated in these resolutions and some issues previously not addressed will be included. The FBF affirms the absurdity of claiming as "drift" its practical selection of subjects for discussion and resolution at its annual meetings that do not always restate matters on which the FBF position is well documented.

The FBF's Continued Use of Resolutions: The FBF believes that annual resolutions are both necessary and helpful in clarifying and documenting its position on certain issues. Resolutions also serve as a much needed stimulus to further education for the benefit of its friends and as a scripturally required rebuke of the enemies of the Bible. The view that resolutions are unnecessarily divisive and/or provocative is rooted in a lack of understanding for the need for a resolute militance in an age of neutralism born of weakness. To whatever degree Fundamentalist affirmations are offensive to those who claim to be Fundamentalists, it is incumbent on both the authors and the opponents of those affirmations to maintain a truly Biblical response. Both a refusal to affirm the truth, as well as arrogant expressions of the truth, tend toward corruption. Resolution of Christian character and resolutions of practical positions are needed. For these reasons, the FBF will continue to use written resolutions to state its positions and appeal for continued fidelity or return to the truth of the Word of God.

CONCERNING FUNDAMENTALISM AND EARNESTLY AND CONTENDING FOR THE FAITH:

Concerning Allegiance to Truth: The FBF affirms the truthfulness, authority, integrity, infallibility, inerrancy, and sufficiency of Scripture in an age in which truth is relative, where all lifestyles, religions and world views have equal validity, where political correctness is the order of the day and where reality exists only in the eye of the beholder. Under the guise of "pluralism," both secular humanism and so-called "New Age" theology have virtually outlawed fundamental truth as exclusive and intolerant. This mind set must be aggressively exposed and opposed through the bold exposition of the Word of God.

Concerning Commitment to Prayer and Study: While recognizing the benefit of careful study of "postmodern thought" and a good understanding of the error fundamental pastors must strive to correct, the FBF believes that the proper position of a true Fundamentalist is maintained through unwavering commitment to earnest prayer and diligent study of the Word of God. Fundamentalists must strive to be powerful in prayer, expert in exposition, clear in communication, and militant in maintaining their personal and ecclesiastical separation. The FBF affirms that there is no substitute, biblical or practical, for prayer and study. Earnestly contending for the Faith must begin with earnestly seeking to understand and live the Faith.

Concerning Separation: The FBF asserts that there can be no true Biblical Fundamentalism without a Biblical doctrine of separation, and that it is not sufficient to hold to the "fundamentals of the Faith" without a commitment to "earnestly contend for the Faith" (Jude 3) and to separate from those who deny that Faith outright, or refuse to obey it in practice. That which calls itself Fundamentalism that does not insist on obedience to the Bible is a "form which true Fundamentalists must separate. The notion that so-called "degrees" of separation exist is fallacious. Some have suggested that the man that holds hands with the heretic is a compromiser from whom we must separate just as we would the heretic, but that the man that holds hands with the compromiser is merely 'questionable.' We believe that if the so-called "questionable" man is holding hands in disobedience, there is no difference in his disobedience than that of the man who is clearly a compromiser. If he is "questionable," we say, "Ask your questions." The answers given will shortly reveal whether a man is disobedient or simply ignorant of the issues at stake. If he can be restored in a spirit of meekness, he should be; if not, separation is the Biblical response. This is not so-called "second-degree" separation, it is obedience.

Concerning the Continued Slander of Biblical Fundamentalism: Whereas the word "Fundamentalism" was coined to describe Biblical Christianity in the early part of this century, and whereas some modernist and compromising scholars who know this have deliberately contributed to or catered to the redefinition of "Fundamentalism," while other basically orthodox believers foolishly participate in this confusion by using terms such as "Islamic fundamentalists" and the like, the FBF makes no apology for its continued adherence to the correct use of the term. Believing that what is actually under attack is the faithful adherence to Biblical Christianity and that attack will never diminish or abate in this dispensation, the FBF affirms that is both unnecessary and unworkable to seek to avoid confusion and misunderstanding by desiring or promoting some other term whereby fundamental Baptists may be identified. Our task is to demonstrate what true Fundamentalism is by our Godliness, and to refuse to allow our enemies to set the agenda for our ministries. We emphatically deny that Fundamentalism includes any other religion (such as Islam), cult (such as the so-called "Heaven's Gate" cult), or those aberrations of Christianity that neither believe nor obey the whole truth of the Bible (such as charismatics). We deplore-but are not surprised by-the incessant slander of Fundamentalism as nothing more than the predicted slander of Christ's true disciples (John 15:20, 2 Tim. 3:12). As the FBF has repeatedly stated, "the core of historic Fundamentalism is its commitment to matters of doctrine. . . . Fundamentalism is a theological movement governed by its commitment to the absolute authority of God's inspired and inerrant Word."

CONCERNING TRENDS AND ISSUES IN THE MINISTRY:

Concerning Ecumenical Evangelism, Jerry Falwell, and Billy Graham: The FBF reaffirms its many previous warnings against the errors of ecumenical evangelism. We point to the logical consequence of the direction of Jerry Falwell set long ago in his recent recognition of Billy Graham at Liberty University. Separatists are often accused of being unloving or even of raising our hand against "God's anointed" when we cry out against the dangers of such men and their methods. We argue that they are not only doing little to correct the woes of the godless society to which they so sweetly minister a neutralized gospel, but that they should be properly held responsible for having produced it in large measure. Had Neoevangelicalism not cut the authority out from under the pulpits of America, there would have been a greater army of prophets to speak against the rock and roll rebellion that began in the 50s, the sexual revolution of the 60's, the drug culture of the 70s, the hedonism of the 80's, and the theological retardation of the 90s. Neoevangelicalism has prevailed for over a generation in its "infiltration" of ecclesiastical society and the results are what we see.

Concerning The Charismatic Movement: In addition to our affirmations about the errors and confusion of the Charismatic movement stated previously, we adamantly oppose the folly of the so-called 'laughing revival,' the proliferation of gaudy and ungodly charismatic television programs with their entertainment format and heretical teaching. This movement has long since gone from being either a nuisance or a mere drain on the money and manpower of local churches to a well organized cult with a deceived membership ready to follow the Antichrist so long as he will satisfy their growing appetite for ecstatic religious experience.

Concerning the NIV: The position of the FBF on the textual/translation issue is well documented, but we must now condemn the recent offering of a "gender-neutral" NIV by Zondervan and warn all Fundamentalists to beware the direction of this unscriptural, profit-driven decision by this "religious arm" of a large secular publishing firm. Although, under pressure, Zondervan has backed down on an American release of this recent version, its distribution in Great Britain seems to be a clear indication of a dangerous intent.

Concerning a Commitment to Godly, Christ-honoring Music: The FBF rejects the notion that music is not a matter of separation. Clearly, we would separate from a pastor or church that used rock music either to attract a crowd or-God forbid-in worship. Therefore, we recognize that it is a separation issue. The encroachment of "CCM" or Contemporary Christian Music as a musical genre has been ignored too long. It is wrong to judge motives subjectively, but it is essential to discern the implications of methods, particularly in music. Fundamentalists should be able to agree that we must be committed to Godly, Christ-honoring music. With sufficient prayerful discussion with Fundamentalist musicians, and necessary study of the subject by our preachers we will be able to move toward a consensus of what is meant by 'Christ-honoring' music in practice. We call for Fundamentalists to cease defending tastes in music as a matter of "preference" and begin to expound the principles whereby those who need guidance on this issue can be truly helped. We assert that those who boast of their "balance' and 'objectivity" while rejecting the teaching of biblical principles concerning music are compromising the means whereby this issue can be resolved. Neither tradition nor taste are the issue. The Bible communicates principles of music that is acceptable to God that can and should be known and taught.

Concerning the Preeminence of Christ: The FBF believes that in our age which both subtly and overtly detracts from the Person and work of Christ, that we must again emphasize "that in all things He might have the preeminence" (Colossians 1:18). The modern tendency toward the syncretism of the Christian faith and world religions and the minimization and the lowering of standards of personal holiness under the guise of promoting "grace" can both be traced back to a failure to exalt and appreciate the true Biblical teaching on the person and work of Christ. We recommend that every believer in Christ carefully study the book of Colossians, and that pastors consider teaching its relevant truths to the people for whom they are responsible.

Concerning Servant-Leadership: The FBF rejoices in the recent emphasis on servant-leadership at conferences, colleges, and in an increasing amount of our writing. We believe that servant-leadership is the Biblical model for pastors and people and is in no way incompatible with militant Fundamentalism. For too long an emphasis on servanthood seemed to be overshadowed by the desperate need for leadership in Biblical Christianity which was being led astray by Neoevangelicalism. We recognize that a renewed focus on servanthood is essential for the correction of our pride and self-reliance while holding firmly to our conviction that we do, in fact, lead-we must lead men to Christ and lead Christians to obedience.

Concerning a Commitment to Evangelism: The FBF believes that "dead orthodoxy" is not Fundamentalism. We have never believed, as some historians have suggested, that true militance means compelling men by the authority of the state to pledge allegiance to the church, but we do believe that militance and evangelism are inseparable. We cannot truly defend the Faith that demands proclamation unless we also proclaim it, nor can we effectively proclaim it without defending it. He is deceived who considers himself a Fundamentalist who thinks he believes but does not obey. It is as absurd to insist that we are earnestly contending for the faith while neglecting soulwinning as it is to insist that soulwinning is more important than contending for the faith. Obedience in practicing separation does not excuse disobedience in proclaiming salvation.

Concerning Repentance: The FBF rejects the idea that preaching repentance is legalistic or the equivalent of requiring sinless perfection. The term "Lordship Salvation" had meaning a generation ago that is lost on the present generation. To equate a strong emphasis on repentance with the previous error of "Lordship Salvation" is to fail to understand the temporal context of the earlier controversy. We believe that a man is not saved by accepting Christ as Savior while consciously rejecting Him as Lord. We believe that repentance means that a man must turn from his self-reliance and the sin that expresses it, and turn to Christ as his only hope of salvation. We do not believe that a man must necessarily understand the extent of his depravity to accept the fact of it, nor that he must, or even can, understand at that point the degree to which Christ will become Lord of his life as he grows in his understanding and knowledge of the Lord and His Word after he is saved. Repentance is clearly a biblical aspect of salvation. We call on evangelists and pastors to be clear in their teaching and if they mention controversies, past or present, to be informed and to be careful not to assume their listeners are aware of or well- taught on the controversy. As always, preach the truth in power and error will be much easier to expose.

CONCERNING TRENDS AND ISSUES IN SOCIETY:

Concerning the Family: The FBF deplores the current trend to redefine the family to include practically any group of people living in often bizarre circumstances and appeals for consistent and compassionate preaching on Biblical principles addressing the home, marriage, and parenting. Fundamentalists must provide leadership and clear exposition on the will of God in these areas. Pastors must promote church programs that strengthen rather than compete with the family and Christian schools must seek to work closely with families not only to remediate, but to prevent family conflict. The local church must provide a family context for the support of broken families and single Christians while giving primary emphasis to the importance of the Christian home as the training ground of the next generation.

Concerning the Entertainment Industry: Whereas American culture has become obsessed with entertainment and amusement while fascination with immorality, violence, and irreverent foolishness preoccupy the minds of most who are in the industry, and whereas the effects of television, movies, and the widespread presence of facilities for amusement that divides families rather than building them, the FBF rejects the lustful, hedonistic lifestyle that characterizes much of our society and calls on churches and Christians back to Biblical obedience and personal separation from the world. Many who properly stood against the movie theater have fallen silent about the VCR which brings the same messengers of evil into the home. Christians must not depend on the rating systems of Hollywood or the television industry to determine what is suitable for their homes. These rating systems are hopelessly flawed, rooted in a false philosophy, undependable at best, and deceptive. The TV rating system, like the film rating system before it has no doubt opened the door for even more immorality, anti-family values and unbiblical teaching to reach America's children and families through the medium of television. At the very least, Christians should not allow the people in these media to entertain or instruct their children electronically where they would not allow them to do so in person. While we are thankful for legitimate recreational and family building activities, we urge pastors and parents to find wholesome activities that reinforce their teaching to youth rather than feeding their carnal appetites by sponsoring trips to worldly amusement parks and the like. Pastors must teach the practical application of biblical principles without fear of accusations of "legalism."

Concerning the Disney Corporation in Particular: The FBF questions whether the Disney corporation ever was the wholesome, family oriented American asset that many Christians claim that it was, but it certainly has become a liability and reproach to the family with its promotion of homosexuality and New Age deception. We call for believers to avoid the Disney corporations productions, products and parks both to protect families from its influence and to protect its promotion of ungodly philosophies and practices.

Concerning Psychology and False Science: The FBF condemns the approach of psychotherapy in solving spiritual problems, realizing that behavioral therapy can deal only with surface problems and fail to deal with the real problem of man's rebellion against God. Both Humanism and the New Age Movement which has filled the spiritual void left in the wake of the atheism of Secular Humanism are products of this rebellion and depend on the false science of evolution and psychotherapy for their "respectability." Evolution has provided an alternative to accountability to God and psychotherapy provides an alternative for biblical answers to the problems rooted in sin; thus God is eliminated and man is encouraged. The Bible is sufficient for man's problems and fundamentalists must be prepared to teach the truth that the carnal mind is enmity against God, that confession of personal responsibility of sin rather than blaming others (which began immediately with the fall of Adam) is essential, and that our only hope of deliverance from sin is in a reliance upon the Holy Spirit rather than self or self-designed religion. We deplore the supplanting of Bible truth by that which is not true science nor true religion but rather a wicked philosophy of Antichrist.

Concerning Modern Culture and the Degeneration of Society: Professing themselves wise, men have become fools indeed in modern culture and society. The satanic attack on the home and the local church, reinforced by the unreasonable elevation of government education and the hedonistic lifestyle of modern culture have contributed to the cancer of corruption that must necessarily be the expression of human depravity when unrestrained by the salt and light of Christians in strong homes and churches where Christ is loved and honored. Neoevangelical inventions such as "Promise Keepers" which diminish the importance of doctrine-the basis of all spiritual reproof, correction and instruction- while promoting ecumenism which renders all world views equally invalid, including the Biblical world view, by combining them into one humanistic world view, and which offer para-church alternatives that give rise to anti-church sentiments have not and cannot correct the problem. Compromised Christianity appears anemic and pathetic when trying to speak out against the evil arrogance of issues such as cloning or euthanasia. Public discourse on ethics now ignores the Word of God. The so-called user-friendly, market-driven approach to the ministry is a futile attempt to compensate for the anti-church attitude that Neoevangelicalism has produced. A degenerate church will encourage a degenerate society. Although, as premillennialists, we do not accept the salvaging of society as our primary mission in distinction to the salvaging of the souls of men, we accept the challenge as defenders of the truth to be the salt and light our degenerate society desperately needs.

Concerning Government and the Clinton Administration: Whereas the Bible plainly teaches that Christians are to render due honor to all those who are in authority over them, including and especially all political authorities, and that it is a sign of this evil age that people feel no qualms about speaking and acting in an unscripturally disrespectful manner toward political leaders with whom they disagree, nevertheless, we are scripturally obligated as representatives of the Lord Jesus Christ to speak the truth regarding righteousness and sin. We dare not disregard our charge to be messengers to cry out against the sin of both the people and their leaders. In light of this charge, the FBF, with heaviness of heart, states that the Clinton administration's continued disregard of the biblically moral and humane teaching regarding abortion, homosexuality, immorality, and honesty will only hasten the judgment of Almighty God upon a wicked and sinful nation. The FBF calls upon all Fundamentalists and Bible-believing Christians to repent of unscriptural attitudes of rebellion toward civil authority and neglect of obedience in prayer that God will open the eyes of those in authority to the truth concerning social and private evil in an attitude of submission to God.

Concerning Homosexuality: It appears that not only modernists, but many neoevangelicals and so-called 'conservatives' have caved in to the denial that the Bible condemns homosexuality as an abomination to God. The FBF believes that denying the clear teaching of the Bible on this perversion is not compassion for those trapped in sin, but a blasphemous denial of Bible truth. The essence of perversion is perversion of the truth. We ourselves must remember that "a false balance is an abomination" and we are powerless to confront the perversion of truth in others while hiding it within our own hearts. Our message is not merely external morality, but spiritual regeneration. Any sinner who will acknowledge his sin and will receive the forgiveness of Jesus Christ will be forgiven and can be delivered from not only the penalty of his sin, but also from its power.

CONCERNING OUR HOSTS: The FBF expresses its sincere appreciation to Dr. Bob Taylor and the people of the Colonial Hills Baptist Church of Indianapolis, Indiana, in hosting the 77th annual meeting of the Fundamental Baptist Fellowship. We praise the Lord for their servant's hearts and for the gracious way in which they have made their facilities and personal services available to us for these days. We pray for God's richest blessings on them. 1997 Resolutions Committee Dr. John C. Vaughn, Chairman Dr. Collins Glen Dr. Matt Olson Dr. Jim Singleton Dr. Bob Taylor Dr. J. B. Williams